Dear James Dashner,
I'm not asking for "and they lived happily forever after"
I am FUCKING JUST ASKING FOR "AND THEY LIVED"
IS.THAT.TOO.MUCH???????
LOOK. YA'LL. LAST MONTH I WAS LOOKING LIKE TOM AND NOW I LOOK LIKE SQUID GAME MC???? IF I EVER LOOK LIKE A SQUID GAME MC LET IT BE SI-WAN. BECAUSE I DON'T PLAN ON LOOKING TRAUMATIZED DAWG. I CAN'T DO THIS ANYMORE WTF, NOT EVEN DOSTOEVSKY IS THIS CRUEL. πππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππ To who ever made this traumatized look of Squid Game MC, Thank you. (ππππ)
Desenho torto q eu fiz quando tava no tΓ©dio no trabalho aaa
Newt: If I adopt a baby?
Thomas: I can be your baby
Newt:
Thomas: And you can be my daddy
Newt:
Newt: Do you want some milk too?
Devastated.
the 'light becomes a shinigami after dying' theory has always been a favorite of mine
where r u, gladers, letβs revive some tmr spirit
Western au pt.2
I'm re-reading the Harry Potter saga, and I've realized that in the third book (Prisoner of Azkaban), there's a quote about the Dursleys having oppressed Harry's magic for a lifetime.
We know that an obscurial is created this way, as was the case with Aurelius Dumbledore (Credence Barebone) and, as far as we can tell, with Ariana Dumbledore.
So, following that logic, could Harry Potter have been an obscurial too, if the concept had already existed at the time of the books' release?
AnaΓ―s Nin, from a novel titled "A Spy in the House of Love," published in 1954